Market Risk Measurement of Sharia Stock Portfolios Using Monte Carlo–Based Var: Evidence From An Indonesian Sharia Insurance Company

Authors

  •  Wahri Irawan Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  •  Mochamad Indrajit Roy Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  •  Fitri Raya Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  •  Ikin Ainul Yakin Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  •  Rustamunadi Rustamunadi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36908/isbank.v11i2.1791

Keywords:

Market Risk, Sharia Portofolio, Value at Risk, Monte Carlo Simulation, Diversification

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the investment risk of PT A's sharia stock portfolio during the period of May-August 2025 using the Value at Risk (VaR) approach. The research sample consists of nine stocks listed in the Sharia Securities List (DES), comparing the Parametric VaR and Monte Carlo Simulation methods in measuring the aggregate risk of cross-sector portfolios. The results show that the Monte Carlo approach produces risk estimates that are more responsive to abnormal return distributions and contain fat tail phenomena compared to the parametric method. Based on validity testing (backtesting), the Monte Carlo VaR model is statistically valid at a 95% confidence level with a VaR value of −2.74%, but it is not valid at a 99% confidence level because it fails to capture extreme price movements. These findings indicate that even though diversification has been applied, PT A's portfolio risk remains higher than the sharia market risk due to weight concentration in volatile sectors such as petrochemicals and minerals. Therefore, 95% VaR is recommended as the basis for determining daily operating capital reserves in order to maintain the Risk-Based Capital (RBC) ratio above the minimum regulatory limit set by the Financial Services Authority of 120%, while continuing to supplement risk measurement through additional risk mitigation in extreme market conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abduh, M., & Isma, S. N. Z. (2017). Economic and market predictors of solvency of family takaful in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(3), 334–344.

Addini, S. N., Berakon, I., & Muhammad, N. N. (2024). Gaining Sustainable Performance through Risk Management System: Dealing with Uncertainty in Islamic Insurance Companies. Muslim Business and Economics Review, 3(2), 334–363. https://doi.org/10.56529/mber.v3i2.306

Al Janabi, M. A. M. (2014). Analysis of market risk of Islamic and conventional portfolios and stock indices: Evidence from the Gulf Cooperation Council markets. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 7(2), 210-227

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2006). International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework. Bank for International Settlements.

Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2021). Investments. McGraw-Hill Education.

Cahyandari, R., Kalfin, R., Sukono, R., Purwani, S., Ratnasari, D., Herawati, T., & Mahdi, S. (2023). The Development of Sharia Insurance and Its Future Sustainability in Risk Management: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108130

Chong, J. K., Lee, H. S., & Liew, P. X. (2024). Is Takaful (Islamic Insurance) More Efficient Than Conventional Insurance? a Comparative Analysis of the Malaysian Insurance Industry. International Journal of Business and Society, 25(2), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.7611.2024

Faizuddin, M., Zuki, M., Arif, M., Ishak, F., Izzuddin, M., & Roja, H. (2024). Takaful Business Model and Business Performance: a Comparative Evidence From the Global Takaful Industry. International Journal of Islamic Business, 9(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijib2024.9.1.1

Glasserman, P. (2003). Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering. Springer

Haerani, S. A., & Kholis, N. (2024). Effect of investment returns, risk-based capital, and underwriting results on the profit of Islamic life insurance company: A case study of PT. Takaful Keluarga 2017-2024. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 10(2), 1115–1142. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol10.iss2.art25

Haniatur Rofika, & Kurniawati Meylianingrum. (2024). Factors that Influence the Profits of Takaful Companies in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 5(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.47700/jiefes.v5i1.7436

Herawati, M. (2024). Linking Corporate Governance with Investment Growth: Evidence from General Shariah Insurance in Indonesia. Al-Falah: Journal of Islamic Economics, 9(2), 43–56.

Heryanti, S. A. (2017). Perhitungan Value at Risk Pada Portfolio Optimal : Studi erbandingan Saham Syariah dan Saham Konvensional. 2(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.24042/febi.v2i1.943

Hull, J. C. (2016). Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives (Eight). Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.23874/amber/2016/v7/i1/121351

Husnan, S. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Sekuritas (Edisi 5). Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Jorion, P. (2007). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk. McGraw-Hill Education

Klugman A., S., Panjer H., H., & Willmot E., G. (2012). Loss Models: Nonlife Actuarial Models (Fourth Edi). Wiley.

Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selecion. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.

Mubarok, F. K., Darmawan, A. R., & Luailiyah, Z. (2017). Optimalisasi Portofolio Nilai Saham: Studi Komparasi Kinerja Saham Syariah dan Nonsyariah. Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 8(2), 309–336. https://doi.org/10.21580/economica.2017.8.2.2368

Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 26/ SEOJK.05/2017, (2017).

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2024). Laporan Perkembangan Keuangan Tahun 2024.

Parodi, P. (2022). Pricing in General Insurance. CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group).

Robbyah, A. S., Mubarok, F. K., El Junusi, R., & Wahyudi, R. (2021). Analysis of the Return and Risk of Investment in Insurance Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. At-Taqaddum, 13(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.21580/at.v13i1.8949

Sinaga, J., Wu, T., & Chen, Y. W. (2022). Impact of government interventions on the stock market during COVID-19: a case study in Indonesia. In SN Business and Economics (Vol. 2, Issue 9). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00312-4

Tsay, R. S. (2010). Analysis of Financial Time Series. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-08

How to Cite

Irawan, W., Roy, M. I., Raya, F., Yakin, I. A., & Rustamunadi, R. (2026). Market Risk Measurement of Sharia Stock Portfolios Using Monte Carlo–Based Var: Evidence From An Indonesian Sharia Insurance Company. Islamic Banking : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Perbankan Syariah, 11(2), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.36908/isbank.v11i2.1791