Market Risk Measurement of Sharia Stock Portfolios Using Monte Carlo–Based Var: Evidence From An Indonesian Sharia Insurance Company
Keywords:
Market Risk, Sharia Portofolio, Value at Risk, Monte Carlo Simulation, DiversificationAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the investment risk of PT A's sharia stock portfolio during the period of May-August 2025 using the Value at Risk (VaR) approach. The research sample consists of nine stocks listed in the Sharia Securities List (DES), comparing the Parametric VaR and Monte Carlo Simulation methods in measuring the aggregate risk of cross-sector portfolios. The results show that the Monte Carlo approach produces risk estimates that are more responsive to abnormal return distributions and contain fat tail phenomena compared to the parametric method. Based on validity testing (backtesting), the Monte Carlo VaR model is statistically valid at a 95% confidence level with a VaR value of −2.74%, but it is not valid at a 99% confidence level because it fails to capture extreme price movements. These findings indicate that even though diversification has been applied, PT A's portfolio risk remains higher than the sharia market risk due to weight concentration in volatile sectors such as petrochemicals and minerals. Therefore, 95% VaR is recommended as the basis for determining daily operating capital reserves in order to maintain the Risk-Based Capital (RBC) ratio above the minimum regulatory limit set by the Financial Services Authority of 120%, while continuing to supplement risk measurement through additional risk mitigation in extreme market conditions.
Downloads
References
Abduh, M., & Isma, S. N. Z. (2017). Economic and market predictors of solvency of family takaful in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(3), 334–344.
Addini, S. N., Berakon, I., & Muhammad, N. N. (2024). Gaining Sustainable Performance through Risk Management System: Dealing with Uncertainty in Islamic Insurance Companies. Muslim Business and Economics Review, 3(2), 334–363. https://doi.org/10.56529/mber.v3i2.306
Al Janabi, M. A. M. (2014). Analysis of market risk of Islamic and conventional portfolios and stock indices: Evidence from the Gulf Cooperation Council markets. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 7(2), 210-227
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2006). International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework. Bank for International Settlements.
Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2021). Investments. McGraw-Hill Education.
Cahyandari, R., Kalfin, R., Sukono, R., Purwani, S., Ratnasari, D., Herawati, T., & Mahdi, S. (2023). The Development of Sharia Insurance and Its Future Sustainability in Risk Management: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108130
Chong, J. K., Lee, H. S., & Liew, P. X. (2024). Is Takaful (Islamic Insurance) More Efficient Than Conventional Insurance? a Comparative Analysis of the Malaysian Insurance Industry. International Journal of Business and Society, 25(2), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.7611.2024
Faizuddin, M., Zuki, M., Arif, M., Ishak, F., Izzuddin, M., & Roja, H. (2024). Takaful Business Model and Business Performance: a Comparative Evidence From the Global Takaful Industry. International Journal of Islamic Business, 9(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijib2024.9.1.1
Glasserman, P. (2003). Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering. Springer
Haerani, S. A., & Kholis, N. (2024). Effect of investment returns, risk-based capital, and underwriting results on the profit of Islamic life insurance company: A case study of PT. Takaful Keluarga 2017-2024. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 10(2), 1115–1142. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol10.iss2.art25
Haniatur Rofika, & Kurniawati Meylianingrum. (2024). Factors that Influence the Profits of Takaful Companies in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 5(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.47700/jiefes.v5i1.7436
Herawati, M. (2024). Linking Corporate Governance with Investment Growth: Evidence from General Shariah Insurance in Indonesia. Al-Falah: Journal of Islamic Economics, 9(2), 43–56.
Heryanti, S. A. (2017). Perhitungan Value at Risk Pada Portfolio Optimal : Studi erbandingan Saham Syariah dan Saham Konvensional. 2(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.24042/febi.v2i1.943
Hull, J. C. (2016). Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives (Eight). Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.23874/amber/2016/v7/i1/121351
Husnan, S. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Sekuritas (Edisi 5). Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
Jorion, P. (2007). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk. McGraw-Hill Education
Klugman A., S., Panjer H., H., & Willmot E., G. (2012). Loss Models: Nonlife Actuarial Models (Fourth Edi). Wiley.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selecion. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
Mubarok, F. K., Darmawan, A. R., & Luailiyah, Z. (2017). Optimalisasi Portofolio Nilai Saham: Studi Komparasi Kinerja Saham Syariah dan Nonsyariah. Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 8(2), 309–336. https://doi.org/10.21580/economica.2017.8.2.2368
Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 26/ SEOJK.05/2017, (2017).
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2024). Laporan Perkembangan Keuangan Tahun 2024.
Parodi, P. (2022). Pricing in General Insurance. CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group).
Robbyah, A. S., Mubarok, F. K., El Junusi, R., & Wahyudi, R. (2021). Analysis of the Return and Risk of Investment in Insurance Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. At-Taqaddum, 13(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.21580/at.v13i1.8949
Sinaga, J., Wu, T., & Chen, Y. W. (2022). Impact of government interventions on the stock market during COVID-19: a case study in Indonesia. In SN Business and Economics (Vol. 2, Issue 9). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00312-4
Tsay, R. S. (2010). Analysis of Financial Time Series. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Islamic Banking : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Perbankan Syariah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish the manuscript in this journal agree to the following terms:

Islamic Banking by Islamic Banking is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License This permits anyone to:
- Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.







